Loading...
Preparing your experience
Preparing your experience
Five patterns for building AI agents that work in production
After shipping AI agents at Google, Meta, and in robotics, I've learned that production reliability comes down to five core patterns. Most teams skip these and wonder why their demos don't scale.
When the model fails, the system should degrade to a simpler behavior, not crash. Design fallback chains: GPT-4 → GPT-3.5 → rule-based → human handoff.
Implementation: Define degradation levels in your agent config. Each level should have clear success criteria and automatic promotion/demotion logic.
Agents need guardrails. Define explicit boundaries for what the agent can and cannot do. Use allowlists, not blocklists.
Implementation: Create an "action registry" with permissions, rate limits, and approval requirements. Every agent action must be registered.
You can't debug what you can't see. Every agent decision should be traceable, with clear reasoning chains and intermediate states logged.
Implementation: Structured logging with decision IDs, reasoning traces, and state snapshots. Use your existing observability stack (Datadog, Honeycomb, etc.).
Build UIs for humans to intervene, not just monitor. Operators need to be able to pause, override, and teach the agent in real-time.
Implementation: Create operator dashboards with pause/resume, manual override, and feedback collection. Make intervention easy.
Never ship agents to 100% of traffic on day one. Use feature flags, gradual rollout, and automatic rollback on quality degradation.
Implementation: Start at 1% traffic with strict quality gates. Double traffic weekly if metrics hold. Auto-rollback on SLO violations.
At Meta, we launched Instagram Calling using these patterns:
Track these metrics:
Target: AIR < 5%, MTTR < 5 minutes, Task Completion > 95%
I work with teams to implement these frameworks in production AI systems.